|
Footnotes
|
1. Professor Bruce Lehmann of the University of California at San
Diego co-chaired the meeting. This Auction Countdown was written
afterwards from an outline for my talk. An "addendum" follows, which was handed
out at the meeting, and contains suggested research topics that could test the
hidden assumptions of the National Market System. A second addendum, originally
presented at the outset of my talk, looks at medical research as an example of
another field besides microstructure that shows apparent bias in favor of
intervention.
|
|
2. Professor William Christie of Vanderbilt
University and Professor Paul Schultz of Ohio State University, "Why Do
Nasdaq Market Makers Avoid Odd-eighth Quotes?" Journal of Finance
study (1994). The study triggered an antitrust investigation of Nasdaq
dealer market practices. Its key finding was that the lack of the expected
number of "odd-eighths" in dealer bid and offer quotations (i.e., those
landing on 3/8, 5/8, etc.) might be the result of "tacit collusion" among
dealers to avoid them. |
|
3. For several examples of bias in vaccine
research, see the Second Addendum. |
|
4. The 1975 Amendments to the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 added Section 11A, which called on the SEC to
"facilitate the establishment of a national market system for securities."
This marked the first time the SEC had significant market design authority,
in addition to the authority to police the market for fraud which it had had
since the ’34 Act created the agency. The goals the SEC was directed to
facilitate were economically efficient executions, fair competition,
transparency of quotes and trades, the opportunity to obtain best execution,
and the opportunity to obtain execution without dealer intervention. |
|
5. What Smith actually said was: "People of
the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but
the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some
contrivance to raise prices. It is impossible indeed to prevent such
meetings, by any law which either could be enacted, or would be consistent
with liberty and justice. But though the law cannot hinder people of the
same trade from sometimes assembling together, it ought to do nothing to
facilitate such assemblies, much less to render them necessary."
[emphasis added] |
|
6. For example, former Justice Department
Antitrust Division chief Joel Klein, in a January 29, 1998 address to
antitrust lawyers, "The Importance of Antitrust Enforcement in the New
Economy," said: "If you go all the way back to Adam Smith’s seminal work,
The Wealth of Nations, you will see that, despite his pro-market,
laissez-faire take on the economy, he fully recognized that the Government
has a crucial role to play in assuring that businesses do not attempt to
end-run the competitive process." In a more recent example, James Surowiecki
criticizes the Sotheby’s and Christie’s price fixers for their explicitness,
using the usual Adam Smith quote to imply both his own sophistication to
comment on such matters and the stupidity of doing anything so obviously
contrary to Adam Smith and antitrust law. If they had only followed a more
tacit approach called "conscious parallelism," he suggests everything would
have been all right. (Apparently he has not heard what happened to Nasdaq.)
"Price Fixing for Dummies," The New Yorker (December 4, 2000). |
|
7. Richard A. Posner, Natural Monopoly
and its Regulation, 30th Anniversary Edition, 1999. |
|
8. What Hippocrates actually said was: "I
will abstain from whatever is deleterious and mischievous. I will give no
deadly medicine to anyone if asked, nor suggest any such counsel." |
|
9.Professors Robert Schwartz and Dan
Weaver of the Zicklin School of Business, Baruch College, "What We Think
About the Quality of Our Equity Markets: A Survey" (forthcoming). |
|
10. Ananth Madhavan, Dave Porter and
Dan Weaver, "Should Securities Markets Be Transparent?" (November 1999). |
|
11. This difference was discussed in
Auction Countdowns dated November 30, 1997 and March 9, 1998, among
others. |
|
12. Robert J. Shiller, Irrational
Exuberance, 2000. |
|
13. Vernon Smith, "Reflections on [Mises’]
Human Action After 50 Years," Cato Journal, Vol. 19, No. 2
(Fall 1999). Also see The Evolution of Cooperation, 1984, by Robert
Axelrod. |
|
14. Richard H. Thaler, The Winner’s
Curse, 1992. |
|
15. Debbie Bookchin and Jim Schumacher,
"The Virus and the Vaccine," The Atlantic Monthly (February 2000).
SV40, or Simian Virus number 40, was the 40th monkey virus
discovered. Almost none of them were known to exist when researchers began
using monkey kidneys as a common substrate for vaccine manufacture. |
|
16. Mesothelioma, virtually unheard of
prior to 1950, is now just "rare," causing 3000 deaths a year, or about 0.5%
of U.S. cancer deaths. |
|
17. The preserved cervical cancer cells
of Henrietta Lacks, who died of her disease, became famous and very popular
among cancer researchers for their robust ability to survive and grow – and
to surreptitiously replace other cell cultures being studied in many
laboratories. Eventually, through sharing of samples – and failure to check
for the contamination – HeLa cells contaminated and, thus, compromised much
cancer research. The episode was noteworthy not for the discovery of
contamination per se, but for the steadfast refusal of researchers,
laboratory officials and even medical journal editors to acknowledge that it
may have occurred, in effect to actively participate in the cover-up. As
with Bernice Eddy, Walter Nelson-Rees, head of the University of California
cell bank, who pursued the HeLa contamination story, was stripped of his lab
and forced to retire at 52. What Happens When Science Goes Bad, 1988,
by Louis Pascal, opens with a synopsis of the HeLa incident described in
A Conspiracy of Cells: One Woman’s Immortal Legacy and the Scandal it
Caused, 1986, by Michael Gold. |
|
18. Wakefield’s hypothesis is that,
because the three vaccines are given together, the body may launch only a
general response to invasion and, thus, may not mount a sufficient
particular response to the Measles vaccine to kill it. This leaves a low
level of live measles virus in the blood that may tie up the immune system’s
ability to fight off other infections, or may in other ways weaken it. In
the case of gut infections, Wakefield calls the resulting condition
"autistic enterocolitis" and suggests that it may interrupt normal
neurological development necessary to support language and social skills.
Whether or not Wakefield’s hypothesis withstands scrutiny, the
circumstantial case for a connection between autism and inflammatory bowel
disease (IBD) is compelling, as is the connection between MMR and autism.
85% of normal (non-autistic) children show no evidence at all of IBD, while
52% of autistic children have the most severe form of it. And data in
California and the UK show that there were similar dramatic and
statistically significant upsurges in autism cases following the
introduction of MMR, although those introductions were separated by a
decade. "Autism, Viral Infection and the Gut-Brain Axis" by Andrew J.
Wakefield and Scott M. Montgomery. |
|
19. Edward Hooper, The River,
1999. |
|
20. Jon Cohen, "The Hunt for the Origin
of AIDS," The Atlantic Monthly, October 2000. |
|
21. Michele Carbone and others maintain
that one reason humans live longer than animals is their ability to defend
against such threats as T-antigen (tumor-antigen), the killer in SV40.
T-antigen causes tumors by binding to and thereby blocking P53, a quality
control agent that makes sure defective cells do not undergo mitosis, the
process by which cells divide and thereby reproduce. Immunosuppression, such
as may result from a variety of factors, from asbestos to many common drugs,
hampers the immune system’s ability to recognize and attack threats like
T-antigen, and thus allows cancers to become established. |
|
22. Some believe that smallpox died out
on its own, as did many diseases, even the Black Plague. And one wonders
whether the Plague would have been so devastating if the conventional wisdom
of the day had not advised against bathing. Since it was thought that
bathing opened up pores through which the disease entered the body, it is
not hard to imagine that, as the Plague spread, greater fear caused an
increase in precisely those habits which would spread it faster and farther.
Thus, conventional wisdom may have encouraged spread of the Plague by
suppressing hygiene just as it encouraged spread of polio by increasing
hygiene. Is it any wonder, then, that there are some who believe that the
conventional wisdom on smallpox – mandatory vaccination – actually caused
the epidemic? Neil Z. Miller, Immunization Theory Versus Reality,
1995. |
|